From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 17 17:03:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA16490 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:03:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from jraynard.demon.co.uk (jraynard.demon.co.uk [158.152.42.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA16425 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 1998 00:02:58 GMT (envelope-from fhackers@jraynard.demon.co.uk) Received: (from fhackers@localhost) by jraynard.demon.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA24866; Sat, 18 Apr 1998 01:02:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from fhackers) Message-ID: <19980418010242.36348@jraynard.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 01:02:42 +0100 From: James Raynard To: rotel@indigo.ie Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PR kern/1144 References: <199804171832.TAA02993@indigo.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.81e In-Reply-To: <199804171832.TAA02993@indigo.ie>; from Niall Smart on Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 07:32:48PM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 07:32:48PM +0000, Niall Smart wrote: > > I noticed you closed off the PR... Yes, I didn't think the macro changes were worth it. > given that OpenBSD, NetBSD, > Solaris, glibc and IRIX are all POSIX compliant in this regard, do > we really want to break ranks? I don't think saving a few microseconds > is worth it. Maybe... > I've appended patches in case I can convince you to > change your mind. :) [snip] Hmm, these are almost exactly the same as the patches in my original PR (except I didn't bother with the man page :-) James To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message