Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 09:03:31 -0600 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=AFren?= Schmidt <sos@ravenock.cybercity.dk> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which lists for discussion. Message-ID: <l03010d01af530d5ea211@[208.2.87.4]> In-Reply-To: <199703171406.PAA04521@ravenock.cybercity.dk> References: <l03010d00af52e59348d3@[208.2.87.4]> from Richard Wackerbarth at "Mar 17, 97 06:28:24 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
S¯ren Schmidt <sos@ravenock.cybercity.dk> said: >Well, actually it is quite easy: > > 2.1.X dead That's what they said about 2.1.5 :-) > 2.2.X stable Only AFTER it has "proven" itself. > 3.x.x current > >Thats it, like it or not :) That's your (narrow) view.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03010d01af530d5ea211>