From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jun 10 10:19:17 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA25872 for stable-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 10:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.barrnet.net (mail.barrnet.net [131.119.246.7]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA25867 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 10:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from solar.os.com (solar.os.com [199.232.136.65]) by mail.barrnet.net (8.7.5/MAIL-RELAY-LEN) with ESMTP id KAA26557 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 10:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jupiter (jupiter.os.com [199.232.136.66]) by solar.os.com (8.7/8.7.0) with SMTP id NAA05738 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:20:47 -0400 Message-Id: <199606101720.NAA05738@solar.os.com> X-Sender: craigs@solar X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:15:53 -0400 To: stable@freebsd.org From: craigs@os.com (Craig Shrimpton) Subject: New kernel error in messages, is it important? Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Folks, I just upgraded to the latest stable and I'm getting this in /var/log/messages. /kernel: bt: unit number (1) too high /kernel: bt1: not found at 0x330 My config file has the following defined: controller bt0 at isa? port "IO_BT0" bio irq ? vector bt_isa_intr My bt0 is at 0x330 irq 11 dma 5 and it seems to work fine. Perhaps this is a message I can ignore? Or, is there a correction? Thanks, -Craig =================================================================== Orbit Internet Email: craigs@os.com 400 Grove Street Phone: (508) 753-8776 Worcester, MA 01605 http://www.os.com/