Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:06:23 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: Eric Badger <badger@freebsd.org> Cc: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> Subject: Re: Kqueue and threading Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmom5q5uP_Gj%2BZNZAfdbipkx8xNv2Kt9VMsSoVpCDsepAFg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1b439846-86d0-457b-a8b9-537c409003f5@FreeBSD.org> References: <111e0c35-7a4b-b6c7-ef1d-1a0d85112e61@digiware.nl> <4209b8d4-6674-a51d-dceb-81c3ecd179c2@FreeBSD.org> <20161003180913.GP54003@zxy.spb.ru> <1b439846-86d0-457b-a8b9-537c409003f5@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
netmap is a special snowflake case, as the last time I checked a whole bunch of assumptions are made about the process/thread contexts doing the work. -adrian On 3 October 2016 at 19:06, Eric Badger <badger@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 10/03/2016 01:09 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:48:03PM -0500, Eric Badger wrote: >> >>> Sharing a kqueue between threads of a process works. Are the workers >> >> Can you comment PR207261? > > Hmm, I don't think I have the netmap expertise to comment. > > Eric >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmom5q5uP_Gj%2BZNZAfdbipkx8xNv2Kt9VMsSoVpCDsepAFg>