From owner-freebsd-chat  Mon Sep 29 11:10:38 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA27182
          for chat-outgoing; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 11:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA27174;
          Mon, 29 Sep 1997 11:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from East.Sun.COM ([129.148.1.241]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id LAA02227; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 11:09:56 -0700
Received: from suneast.East.Sun.COM by East.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id OAA03610; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 14:09:52 -0400
Received: from compound.east.sun.com by suneast.East.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA18167; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 14:09:52 -0400
Received: (from alk@localhost) by compound.east.sun.com (8.8.7/8.7.3) id NAA25663; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 13:14:04 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 13:14:04 -0500 (CDT)
Reply-To: Anthony.Kimball@East.Sun.COM
Message-Id: <199709291814.NAA25663@compound.east.sun.com>
From: Tony Kimball <Anthony.Kimball@East.Sun.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Face: O9M"E%K;(f-Go/XDxL+pCxI5<W_e*r7B8ojMD.5+qDgOp4/\gTQEgbOoBqf:Vtl*aW:<;9/
	UIVk'U^XhYg+v#r~*X<$Q=_ik@5:%E}pl]9|9|:]WLW8n:fLgg0~cfwWRBQxK/HSG0b1D/gljJC$qp
	b=HDF@+"H<|fXy`w#$8#6A"!F:>*gr[=FN@Y`cl1.Tn
To: tom@sdf.com
Cc: Anthony.Kimball@East.Sun.COM, michaelv@MindBender.serv.net,
        freebsd-chat@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: supermicro p6sns/p6sas 
References: <199709291505.KAA25150@compound.east.sun.com>
	<Pine.BSF.3.95q.970929104951.4215A-100000@misery.sdf.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.33 under 19.14 XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoth Tom on Mon, 29 September:

: > And we all know that Intel has had no major Pentium or PPro bugs?
: 
:   Nothing that affected FreeBSD anyhow, and FreeBSD uses a wide variety of
: features.

Well, a lot of FreeBSD systems are used to perform division, for example.
I'd call that a much more serious problem than occasional make world
failures.  More likely to kill someone, for example.  But this should
probably go to chat.