Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:12:16 +0200 From: Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org> To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r365208 - head/www/squidguard Message-ID: <53F1B560.4090003@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <53F127D0.3060500@marino.st> References: <201408171718.s7HHIMRh017558@svn.freebsd.org> <9eead94ee58708b60a67fa030af7e2fc@secure.marino.st> <53F127D0.3060500@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/18/14 00:08, John Marino wrote: > On 8/17/2014 20:11, John Marino (FreeBSD) wrote: >> On 2014-08-17 19:18, Guido Falsi wrote: >>> Author: madpilot >>> Date: Sun Aug 17 17:18:22 2014 >>> New Revision: 365208 >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/365208 >>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r365208/ >>> >>> Log: >>> Remove SQUID27 option and make the port depend on squid 3.3 by >>> default due to squid 2.7 being deprecated. >>> >>> Undeprecate. >>> >>> Modified: >>> head/www/squidguard/Makefile >>> >>> Modified: head/www/squidguard/Makefile >> >> >> Hi Guido, Squid 3.2 will be removed the same day as Squid 2.7. It's EOL >> too. >> > > Oh, and if that's not enough, squidguard is at risk of being removed > anyway because databases/db4, of which it depends, is unstaged and > getting removed. see: > > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/misc/screwed.maintained.txt Oops, sorry, I did not notice this much. I'd really like to see this solved, unluckily I'm unable to do this right away, since I'm away from home. The squid port is a useful one for many people I think. So regarding squidguard is it required from me to put back the deprecated line o can it stay as it is for a week or so until I'm able to look at it properly? -- Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53F1B560.4090003>