From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 15 17:31:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0929A1065792; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f164.google.com (mail-bw0-f164.google.com [209.85.218.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2573F8FC27; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4510bwz.43 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:31:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bi/Dj7bTTT2O+VKVyKCP58mjpLc3zUAQMXmcCMHGQ0Q=; b=PKZOkjZ6nBT2jDxVOpQYroNSVKw5FQeKo+B/iPIT6jlYhTmeRSjLIXMe9PuayPC6/Z sWsRCGjRITtp2CLIN0Z1y7ng/4MNO2DiAoWkDa/KNMlw4M763fmt4Qh5AnK5SKuzcczg WhjOQfUo0sp7IV76jH7ob+V0+JbLxGIytXPAo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gT1mpaovSTsal5kkeiRhCvLFyYNYBjCOaZ7pLtAtlDGGQhBq9gXAcbFnxwpf28r7Uv m3oWtD0ZQ/PUI1zXGcPPuRyQPkq6gER8/oB70tnRVCs5vtiGF+AwWRZZDHgk14FeBYBN vl6kXqBl3a4cp8hRsyegVd5mdxlvBQIAp9RtM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.54.65 with SMTP id p1mr397034bkg.195.1239816664039; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:31:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:31:03 +0300 Message-ID: <991123400904151031u20e7e196i78e87bf65ac3f92c@mail.gmail.com> From: Odhiambo Washington To: freebsd-questions , gnome Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Which one of these two is the correct version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:31:08 -0000 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:27 PM, barbara wrote: > > Hello FreeBSD Gnome users, > > > > I have been a KDE user because gnome installation/upgrade presents such a > > pain to me most of the time. Today I decided to upgrade gnome from 2.24 > --> > > 2.26 but decided to visit the gnome pages first to see what is said. This > is > > after looking at /usr/ports/UPDATING and not seeing much to do with this > > particular upgrade. > > > > Now, there are two pages, and both of them seem "upto date", but they > have > > conflicting information: > > > > 1.http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq212.html#q2 - says that *NOTE: Do > notrun > > portupgrade(1) to upgrade to GNOME 2.26!** > > *and goes on to say one should use the gnome-upgrade.sh script, which > > seems to NOT exist in the links. > > 2. http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq226.html#q2 - says you should > use > > the following steps: > > (a) pkgdb -Ff > > (Remove gnome-volume-manager.) > > (b) portupgrade -aOW > > (c) portupgrade -f gnome-media gnome-settings-daemon > > gnome-control-center > > > > So I am just wondering which one is the correct version, since both are > > talking about the upgrade to 2.26. > > > > > > > > 1.http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq212.html#q2 > > 2. http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq226.html#q2 > > Can you see the number between "faq" and ".html"? ;) Barbara, Does that number, whether I see it or not, matter at all? Both cases are talking about *upgrade to 2.26*, unless I also got blind to the issue that mattered to me. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society." -- Mark Twain