From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 29 16:24:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp11.bellglobal.com (smtp11.bellglobal.com [204.101.251.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B3815644 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 16:24:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vanderh@ecf.toronto.edu) Received: from localhost.nowhere (Hamilton-ppp44858.sympatico.ca [206.172.76.51]) by smtp11.bellglobal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA20751; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 19:26:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from tim@localhost) by localhost.nowhere (8.9.3/8.9.1) id TAA26021; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 19:23:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 19:23:30 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: James Howard Cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: replacing grep(1) Message-ID: <19990729192330.B25978@mad> References: <19990729182229.E24296@mad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: ; from James Howard on Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 07:05:57PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 07:05:57PM -0400, James Howard wrote: > > > > DES tells me he has a new version (0.10) which mmap()s. It supposedly > cuts the run time down significantly, I do not have the numbers in front > of me. I do. Still far too slow. I'll work on this tomorrow, since that seems the only way to convince people that mmap is not such a big win. :-( Hmm... Maybe I'll even turn-out to be wrong. ;-) I really believe mmap falls into the category of "might be nice, but not necessary and does complicate things..." -- This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message