From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 7 16:25:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EDA1065675 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from angel.ticketswitch.com (angel.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C848FC1E for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from [10.50.50.2] (helo=smaug.rattatosk) by angel.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JXfO8-000PuE-1J; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:25:40 +0000 Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.50.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by smaug.rattatosk with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JXfO7-000Boe-VD; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:25:39 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JXfO7-0000Og-UP; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:25:39 +0000 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, john@jnielsen.net In-Reply-To: <200803061914.28851.john@jnielsen.net> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:25:39 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: ggated vs iscsi X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:25:41 -0000 > Last time I used it the iscsi-target port had some significant bugs, but > looking through cvs it looks like those may have been addressed. I can't > really speak to performance. Reliability should be all right as long as > you don't have frequent network issues. Thanks for the warning - do you have any refernces for these bugs ? I have been using the iscsi-target for a while and never come across anything problematic, but I havent really hammered it hard as yet. Am currently playing around with using gmirror on a pair of iscsi drives mounted using iscsi_initiator/iscsi-target and it seems to work rather nicely actually. Reconnest if I disconnect a drive, performance is O.K., and it appears to behave itself. I would rather use ZFS on top, but I am not sure I *quite* trust it yet after some of the comments on here and my own expeineces, so gmirror it is for now. -pete.