Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:48:31 -0700 From: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> To: Michael Vince <mv@thebeastie.org> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org, Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Diablo 1.5 JDK and libthr Message-ID: <20060726144831.GA40775@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <44C6B826.5080308@thebeastie.org> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0607241000310.7626-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <44C47D64.6010804@thebeastie.org> <20060725150931.GA31017@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <44C6B826.5080308@thebeastie.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:32:38AM +1000, Michael Vince wrote: > Greg Lewis wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:57:24PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote: > >>I just ran it for you now, lower then the others. > >>libc_r average hits per minute: 6,859 > >>libc_r session average: 3,441 > >>libc_r transactions per minute: 2,310 > > > >Is the machine UP or SMP? > > > SMP, it was rebuild using a generic 6.1 SMP kernel for all these tests, > with HT turned off. > I did actually record load numbers per minute and Java memory usage. I > didn't post these numbers as load reports via top vary greatly from the > various threading libraries. libc_r is pretty much automatically going to lose then, since it can only use one of the CPUs. It would be interesting to see the comparison on a UP machine. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060726144831.GA40775>