From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 16:47:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A427616A4CF for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:47:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6576643D39 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:47:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 48578 invoked by uid 1252); 23 Mar 2004 00:47:07 -0000 Date: 22 Mar 2004 19:47:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:47:07 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger To: Oliver Eikemeier Message-ID: <20040323004707.GG87493@toxic.magnesium.net> Mail-Followup-To: Adam Weinberger , Oliver Eikemeier , Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org References: <200403222030.i2MKUsxc063289@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> <20040322211501.GB87493@toxic.magnesium.net> <405F84AD.1070708@fillmore-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <405F84AD.1070708@fillmore-labs.com> X-Editor: Vim 6.2 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx X-ASL: 6/m/behind you User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:47:07 -0000 >> (03.22.2004 @ 1928 PST): Oliver Eikemeier said, in 0.8K: << > Adam Weinberger wrote: > >>>(03.22.2004 @ 1530 PST): Kris Kennaway said, in 1.6K: << > >> > >>INDEX build failed with errors: > >>Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: openoffice-1.1.1.RC1 > >>Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: es-openoffice-1.1.1.RC1 > >> > >>>end of "INDEX build failed" from Kris Kennaway << > > > >I recognize that it's an unbelievable amount of work to make openoffice > >build right, but can development please be done elsewhere? The port > >doesn't even build right now (it rejects any jdk I have installed in > >configure). If 1.1.1.RC1 isn't working, can you please put 1.1 back in > >the tree? > > > >You're not using openoffice-2.0 for anything. Why not use that for the > >1.1.1.RC1 development for the time being? > > See the discussion in > > >> end of "Re: INDEX build failed" from Oliver Eikemeier << I'm aware of that thread, but I haven't seen noticed anything done about it, except that it now breaks INDEX builds. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@gnome.org \\oo// adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx \\// adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx