Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 11:14:01 -0700 From: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> To: FreeBSD - <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: perl qstn... Message-ID: <20100407181401.GA87548@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20100407030110.GE25911@guilt.hydra> References: <20100406132049.641b9edf@gumby.homeunix.com> <86wrwkiunp.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <2EE33758-C39C-41DC-B6A8-B34CF6B3B25A@mac.com> <86k4sk1mle.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <66F97B7C-9D27-452B-BCC8-30C960599AE0@mac.com> <86d3yc2zib.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86A6FD8C-EF54-4B61-957E-A88A7272F7C0@mac.com> <868w902sp0.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4BBBB305.4070206@ibctech.ca> <20100407030110.GE25911@guilt.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:01:10PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:17:41PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: > > On 2010.04.06 17:10, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > > > > Now, on the other hand, emacs rules, vi sucks. :-) :-) > > > > ok, ok. I was on the side of Perl, and was content following this > > thread, but now I don't like you anymore :P > > > > heh ;) > > > > Steve > > I'm willing to let the emacs users have their emacs, and to enjoy my vi. > I guess the longer name (emacs) suits people who like pressing more > buttons to accomplish the same amount of work anyway. > besides all this, someone can use vi easily with only one hand---or just a few fingers for those of us who still hunt-and-peck. with emacs, gotta have at least 17 hands. > -- > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org The 7.79a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100407181401.GA87548>