From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 4 07:02:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4431065670; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:02:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f183.google.com (mail-px0-f183.google.com [209.85.216.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722008FC12; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13so1067778pxi.3 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:02:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TnHM1Q2DZo3l7gRLL9SKxPnaNMOC4PSZxHNZh14kfl4=; b=X7/UGwJ/TvK8Uih87cpYuvwZCDBQbe+eLU1e371EJuMamudS+/9aN4DkoG7t7wUaH7 nNweSbFDdsKjm7MKxRGZNfJ4MB1qaSZOGXfh2TfZD6xu5Dw8XbVF8LHwOS87AeuH3RRr 5p3ExM590ZOxky9nxWfU3EM7ABTcO6wcLaBw8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=SI2M1s7Nxt+ukUtjAcUwbfyCAQg/XyGig/iU8VQVq6wNHO545fT0Qbkck/3YCzuRij /R4AF9YnUNvM56sbPLzbQ6gyMSXWPYsQB+a0hWO9C8bjry7uMpLNXEJoIvxWbHcXsMi8 JVQAIjba60WM1CtlwpaWrLV5wmeGsWovaKbb4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.5.9 with SMTP id h9mr515504rvi.247.1265266971049; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:02:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <27445155.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <786602c61001311444x57555e2ev213a2b1ef0a5e679@mail.gmail.com> <27445155.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:02:51 +0100 Message-ID: <786602c61002032302w5b6e6c61k6cf1924cd2663596@mail.gmail.com> From: Thomas Zander To: FreeBSD - Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for testing: new mplayer and x264 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:02:52 -0000 Hi, On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 00:07, Jakub Lach wrote: > Since mm took maintainership, maybe it's appropriate to make > x264-devel port for version that requires rebuilding of ports that > depend on it? The problem with that is that there are no releases in x264 at the moment. That is, we would have to define what "stable" and "devel" is. Since both are only snapshots of the dev tree on a particular sunny morning, that is somewhat arbitrary. Furthermore, they would conflict anyways. The problems are, x264 is probably the most important library for encoding at the moment, that we need quite recent build of them for the popular transcoding ports (mencoder and a new handbrake release which has yet to be ported) and the fact that PRs requesting its update are undecided for several months now leave me with the impression that we need a maintainer person for it rather than a mailing list. And I would like to take the job as I obviously need it for mencoder. That's the idea. Riggs