Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 20:15:38 -0800 (PST) From: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net> To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Has anybody addressed this "ping" problem? Is it even an issue with FreeBSD? Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.961122201353.9350f-100000@mail.cdsnet.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.94.961122195935.5812A-100000@misery.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Actually, it says that NetBSD may be vulnerable, and doesn't specifically list the 2.2 or -current branches of FreeBSD. Given 4.4-lite integration, and the possibility the NetBSD was vulnerable, I felt it prudent to ask. On Fri, 22 Nov 1996, Tom Samplonius wrote: > Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 20:06:21 -0800 (PST) > From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> > To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net> > Cc: hackers@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Has anybody addressed this "ping" problem? Is it even an issue with FreeBSD? > > > On Fri, 22 Nov 1996, Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > > > > > > > > http://www.sophist.demon.co.uk/ping/ > > > > > > I believe that the page you are referring to says that FreeBSD is safe, > but it is unreachable right now. But you know that already, because you > read it before referring it, right? > > The BSD codebase has always been free of this bug (well I can't actually > speak about pre-4.3 versions, but I doubt any still exist). > > Tom >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.95.961122201353.9350f-100000>