From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 25 20:20:41 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9A11E5E
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 20:20:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50F101216
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 20:20:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id z12so4146961wgg.18
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:20:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
 h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=VQ5SXEVUM77lH/9E7a4VnlFo4XkoGsqUrFRd4ARjtPc=;
 b=r+jEqc5AetvxumzdVhtDbRntWrkxOiZAeDVcS/FNIZen8n3DwBruVJYX3KNIcNh96d
 C5x6+PVnm6eauZZ+Z+vPncWs1yKrd4grkAlr72PZsCoj+sCHS7LlCbo00BpDAVaOfpWx
 hnlwWaWProrVPvyLieMfza86jZdIJE94Z3Ev6IRVCIWt1yuiRNjpKmLb65YzKIXNcVV4
 9NBX86OngoFUVVEsNJyfGQ6Zrvp/midC+4499uzGUd45dQ7aNDumeq2RCu8oaC/cr8A/
 96iK1BwqQfg5+Vcdx7c4NL+M1wGSNsIKP9fTBK0iIuc1Er5Os/jig+2MywW+O7lHG89g
 TNBw==
X-Received: by 10.180.149.206 with SMTP id uc14mr5451266wib.10.1390681239852; 
 Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:20:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-112-13.bethere.co.uk.
 [87.194.112.13])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hv3sm15374119wib.5.2014.01.25.12.20.38
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:20:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 20:20:38 +0000
From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
Message-ID: <20140125202038.125a4264@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <52E41619.1000505@fjl.co.uk>
References: <52E40CC4.6090401@fjl.co.uk>
 <201401252137.50132.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
 <52E41619.1000505@fjl.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 20:20:41 -0000

On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:52:57 +0000
Frank Leonhardt wrote:


> As you and Waitman both pointed out, nslookup IS part of BIND, yet as
> I said in the diatribe following the question in my post, so is
> "host" and that's still there.=20

=46rom the host manpage:

COMPATIBILITY
     host aims to be reasonably compatible with `host' utility from
     BIND9 distribution,=20