From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 6 23:33:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C4A37B401 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 23:33:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F5243E6E for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 23:33:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gA77XJ8A038782; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 23:33:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from kargl@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gA77XJ07038781; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 23:33:19 -0800 (PST) From: "Steven G. Kargl" Message-Id: <200211070733.gA77XJ07038781@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING In-Reply-To: <20021107.001858.16046925.imp@bsdimp.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 23:33:19 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG M. Warner Losh said: > In message: <200211070717.gA77HjxQ038575@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> > "Steven G. Kargl" writes: > : M. Warner Losh said: > : > In message: <200211070030.gA70UF05024508@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> > : > "Steven G. Kargl" writes: > : > : Could someone add the following patch to UPDATING? > : > : Change the words to whatever suits your fancy. > : > > : > I'm trying to devise a good way to deal with this breakage and hope it > : > is transient. I'm not hopeful :-( I'll consider adding this to UPDATING. > : > > : > : Any user who installed DP1 and a bunch of ports will > : have a unpleasant experience when they update to > : post 20021031 sources. All their ports will stop > : working and it isn't a simple matter to update > : those ports. > > I thought DP1 didn't generate binaries or libraries that contained > __sF. > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/schedule.html DP1 was released on 5 Apr 2002. This may have occurred during Peter's last attempt at killing __sF. DP2 is in progress according to the web page and __sF should not be present. There will also be that group of -current users who lag a few weeks behind in their buildworlds. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message