From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 07:15:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D0F37B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 07:15:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vsmtp12.tin.it (vsmtp12.tin.it [212.216.176.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B9E43F85 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 07:15:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from flag@tin.it) Received: from newluxor.skynet.org (80.182.24.132) by vsmtp12.tin.it (7.0.019) id 3F1BB81400207398 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:14:59 +0200 Received: by newluxor.skynet.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id EFE6AC1; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:16:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:16:41 +0200 From: Paolo Pisati To: FreeBSD_Net Message-ID: <20030729141641.GA257@newluxor.skynet.org> References: <20030728224737.GA47439@newluxor.skynet.org> <20030729103042.GA230@newluxor.skynet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030729103042.GA230@newluxor.skynet.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Useless-Header: Look ma, it's a # sign! X-Operating-System: FreeBSD newluxor.skynet.org 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE Subject: Re: Differences between netgraph nodes in 4.x and 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:15:02 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote: > > btw, i think i did the converion and it was quite straightforward, > but i've still a little problem that i didn't have in 5.x: > > if i try to unload my module, change the internals, compile > and use it again, it fails! =P > > I think it's a problem in the shutdown/disconnect > part of my work, cause this is what i get: > > ngctl mkpeer rl0: tee lower right > ngctl: send msg: File exists > > actually tee is my own node, i didn't yet change the name > to classifier but it's my node. well, i answer to myself: it seems it's not my mistake, cause you can trigger it with a plain original tee node too. =P does it mean that the problem lays inside the inability to delete rl0? the only solution that i found now, when i've to try some modifications to my node, is to reboot, while i'm sure it worked under 5.x... =P bye -- Paolo GUFI: http://www.gufi.org