Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:12:02 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pf@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 242035] pf/pflog failed to load after 12.1-RELEASE upgrade. Message-ID: <bug-242035-16861-sRaVyWLaDX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-242035-16861@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-242035-16861@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D242035 Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open CC| |bz@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #5 from Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz@FreeBSD.org> --- I think we never fixed ip_mroute.ko, did we? Probably my fault if we did = not. I'll go back and see and update here later (or tomorrow) either with a pro= per reference or a patch. Ok, if I am not mistaken we have 8 PAGES =3D 32k of space for modules and t= he vnet_set for ip_mroute on amd64 (head) seems to be 21984 (~22k) alone. I d= on't know how much more the other modules use .. hmm let me check: pf ~13k (hea= d, ouch) pflog 144 bytes. If this setup worked during 12.0 and no longer works in 12.1 then something= has increased the vnet_set size in the modules. Or did the update happen from = 11? I assume loading pf(log) without having loaded ip_mroute will work (could be compiled into the kernel). I can produce a patch tomorrow for ip{,6}_mroute a least to stop this probl= em if you are willing to test? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-242035-16861-sRaVyWLaDX>