From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Mar 22 12:31:37 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA28762
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 12:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gvr.win.tue.nl (root@gvr.win.tue.nl [131.155.210.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA28756
          for <FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 12:31:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from guido@localhost) by gvr.win.tue.nl (8.8.5/8.8.2) id VAA00571 for FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 21:31:20 +0100 (MET)
From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.win.tue.nl>
Message-Id: <199703222031.VAA00571@gvr.win.tue.nl>
Subject: random in kernel
To: FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD-hackers)
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 21:31:20 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I see a random() in libkern. I'm wondering why we cannot
use get_random_bytes() in stead. This gives a much better randomness..

-Guido