From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 5 23:53:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA28382 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 5 Dec 1997 23:53:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA28376; Fri, 5 Dec 1997 23:53:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA17841; Fri, 5 Dec 1997 23:53:48 -0800 (PST) To: Mike Smith cc: Terry Lambert , hsu@FreeBSD.ORG (Jeffrey Hsu), hackers@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: shared library with static Motif? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 06 Dec 1997 16:35:07 +1030." <199712060605.QAA02123@word.smith.net.au> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 1997 23:53:47 -0800 Message-ID: <17837.881394827@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > You make the Motif functions appear inside your shared library? I am > fairly sure we are misunderstanding here; you seem to be describing > "how to link the Motif components statically into your application", > while the StarOffice situation is slightly different. They have all > their GUI components in a shared library which is used by all their > applications. In order to avoid having to distribute the Motif shared > library with their stuff, they include all the Motif functions in the > aforementioned library. Ahhh. OK, you're right, I misunderstood. That's... tricky. :) One would think that TOG would have a significant problem with something like that under the usual terms. I guess they've already mellowed out. Jordan