From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 25 13:43: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869EB37B401 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smart.eusc.inter.net (smart.eusc.inter.net [213.73.101.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0AF43E6E for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:42:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: from tc01-n70-176.de.inter.net ([213.73.70.176] helo=mscu.best-eng.de) by smart.eusc.inter.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #4) id 17uIzF-0003aX-00; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 22:42:21 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Matthias Schuendehuette Reply-To: msch@snafu.de Organization: Micro$oft-free Zone To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Journaled filesystem in CURRENT Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 22:42:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: Anton Yudin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200209252242.19648.msch@snafu.de> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If I may add a comment here... You already *have* a kind of journaled filesystem for some time now. Please read "Soft Updates vs. Journalling Filesystems" from M.K. McKusick (www.mckusick.com). I'm really sad if see the efforts done especially for porting JFS to FreeBSD, which has already under Linux a more than poor performance. The only reason for porting JFS is IMHO to be able to mount JFS Volumes under FreeBSD - if that's worth the effort... Why begging for 'Journaling' if you have 'Journaling next generation'? -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) Powered by FreeBSD 4.7-RC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message