Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 03 Oct 2023 16:10:45 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 274236] [NEW PORT] net-p2p/tremotesf: yet another Transmission GUI
Message-ID:  <bug-274236-7788-V5Jorm25eo@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-274236-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-274236-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D274236

Robert Clausecker <fuz@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fuz@FreeBSD.org
           Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org      |fuz@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #6 from Robert Clausecker <fuz@FreeBSD.org> ---
Thank you for your submission.  Looks pretty good!

If the project has unit tests, check if you can hook them up to the Makefil=
e.=20
There's infrastructure such that "make test" on the port can execute unit
tests, which makes checking updates easier.  Read the Porter's Handbook for
details.

I recommend using the full commit hash for GH_TAGNAME as it's guaranteed no=
t to
be ambiguous.  Short hashes may become ambiguous when the repository grows.

Is it correct that this port does not depend on transmission in any way?  It
looks weird, but perhaps that's just the way it is.

Proceeding with a build test now.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-274236-7788-V5Jorm25eo>