From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 14:00:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8774C16A595 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:00:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C4743D4C for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:00:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8QE0s5j051843 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:00:54 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8QE0sxe051842; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:00:54 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:00:54 GMT Message-Id: <200609261400.k8QE0sxe051842@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Maxim Konovalov Cc: Subject: Re: kern/97591: 6.1-RELEASE crashes on fork bomb X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maxim Konovalov List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:00:55 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/97591; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Konovalov To: Bruce M Simpson Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, peter@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/97591: 6.1-RELEASE crashes on fork bomb Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:56:09 +0400 (MSD) On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, 18:30-0000, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > The following reply was made to PR kern/97591; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Bruce M Simpson > To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: kern/97591: 6.1-RELEASE crashes on fork bomb > Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:27:01 +0100 > > I exercised the pv_entry exhaustion yesterday on 7.0-CURRENT from the > same date. (24 Sep 2006) Sure, because no patches were committed. I suggested to do - pv_maxchunks = pv_entry_max / _NPCP; + pv_maxchunks = MAX(pv_entry_max / _NPCPV, maxproc); in sys/i386/i386/pmap.c but Peter had some different ideas. -- Maxim Konovalov