From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 08:04:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23116DAA for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 08:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.neosystem.cz (mail.neosystem.cz [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:5ab8::10:15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6F56139A for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 08:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.neosystem.cz (unknown [127.0.10.15]) by mail.neosystem.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CEDE6B8 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 10:04:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.neosystem.cz Received: from moon.sn.neosystem.cz (unknown [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:5ab8::100:102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.neosystem.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1192E6B1 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 10:04:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 10:02:36 +0200 From: Daniel Bilik To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone else seeing lockup on boot with r271042? Message-Id: <20140906100236.a63aa268ab5b92abc45da2e4@mail.neosystem.cz> In-Reply-To: References: <20140903204605.GA16445@dft-labs.eu> <5408402B.20704@FreeBSD.org> <5408897F.2040107@dumbbell.fr> Organization: neosystem.cz X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-apple-darwin13) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 08:04:59 -0000 On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 07:57:51 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block wrote: > As of r271160, startup does not have a problem with devd. Only tested > once, though. I can confirm that bunch of recent commits (most probably the mega MFC of vt(4) from emaste@) fixed the problem, and 10-STABLE boots fine for me now. Thank you Ed. :) Dan