From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 9 19:27:48 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA07256 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 9 May 1996 19:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.Clark.Net (mail.clark.net [168.143.0.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA07233 for ; Thu, 9 May 1996 19:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from clark.net (root@clark.net [168.143.0.7]) by mail.Clark.Net (8.7.3/8.6.5) with ESMTP id WAA29827; Thu, 9 May 1996 22:27:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from clark.net (markus@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clark.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id WAA04207; Thu, 9 May 1996 22:27:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199605100227.WAA04207@clark.net> To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu cc: /G=David/S=Sandel/DD.ALISA=SANDELD@mhs-emerson.attmail.com, "o=attmail/dd.id=" Subject: Re: 3C509 vs 3C590 Ethernet Support In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 09 May 1996 15:13:50 PDT." Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 22:27:36 -0400 From: Mark Plummer Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > On Thu, 9 May 1996 /G=David/S=Sandel/DD.ALISA=SANDELD@mhs-emerson.attmail.com > the snap back in late march did, so i assume the latest snap does. i've used it to some success, but performance is not good, particularly w' more than one card in the machine (we intended to use it as a router w' 4 of 'em). if anyone knows any more info on the little bit i've said, great; otherwise, i hope to get the details together and make a better post real soon... markus -- Mark Plummer, markus@clark.net, +1 410 796 1272