From owner-freebsd-security Mon Aug 27 17:11:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from poontang.schulte.org (poontang.schulte.org [209.134.156.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D8C37B407 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:11:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from christopher@schulte.org) Received: from schulte-laptop.schulte.org (nb-97.netbriefings.com [209.134.134.97]) by poontang.schulte.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90FBD14B9; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:11:17 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010827190703.022a6e20@pop.schulte.org> X-Sender: schulte@pop.schulte.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:10:47 -0500 To: Mikhail Kruk From: Christopher Schulte Subject: Re: procmail, squid: any takers? Cc: Mikhail Kruk , In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010827185459.022a3de0@pop.schulte.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 08:07 PM 8/27/2001 -0400, Mikhail Kruk wrote: >please tell me what am I doing wrong. I'm cvsup'ing to RELENG_4. Using >cvsup3.freebsd.org and grab src-all >This is the beginning of my UPDATING file: Sorry, I was referring specifically to the 'security' branch of RELENG_4_3, not -STABLE (RELENG_4). >So following UPDATING or even cvs logs isn't really enough. I still think >that it would be a good idea to release informal notifications. I agree >that security officer would be burried under cries for help, but I think >that there is enough crap (like this discussion :) on the list already. Is >it going to be that much worse? Yes, I think it's possible. And to that, I'll refrain from anymore public replies. For now. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message