Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 16:38:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 225217] [NEW PORT] security/py-pycryptodomex: Cryptographic library for Python Message-ID: <bug-225217-13-jya0z4Oo2W@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-225217-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-225217-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D225217 John W. O'Brien <john@saltant.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #189798|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #190318| |maintainer-approval+ Flags| | --- Comment #1 from John W. O'Brien <john@saltant.com> --- Created attachment 190318 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D190318&action= =3Dedit security/py-pycryptodomex: New port The overall description and QA results are the same as before. This patch is simpler and more robust thanks in large part to improvements upstream. Notes =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D * Don't set LICENSE because trying to satisfy portlint in a slave seems a futile exercise. * Reuse the distfile from the master and create file to trigger alternate namespace behavior. * security/py-pycryptodome and security/py-pycryptodome should have a common MAINTAINER. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-225217-13-jya0z4Oo2W>