From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Jan 25  2:40: 6 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3A137B405
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 02:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E124F43F1E
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 02:40:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0PAe4NS034896
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 02:40:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h0PAe43M034895;
	Sat, 25 Jan 2003 02:40:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 02:40:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200301251040.h0PAe43M034895@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: buhrow@lothlorien.nfbcal.org
Subject: Re: kern/25777: atime not updated on exec
Reply-To: buhrow@lothlorien.nfbcal.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR kern/25777; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: buhrow@lothlorien.nfbcal.org
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, pdp@nl.demon.net
Cc: buhrow@lothlorien.nfbcal.org
Subject: Re: kern/25777: atime not updated on exec
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 02:38:14 -0800 (PST)

 	Hello.  Having not read these patches thoroughly, it's unclear
 to me if they cause the atime field to be updated if a segment of an
 executable is paged-in during program execution, i.e. when new data needs
 to be paged in for a daemon process, but historical behavior on FreeBSD, as
 well as other BSDish systems suggests that it should.  Also, I note that
 the bug is still present in FreeBSD-4.7 stable as of December 2002.  It
 would be very nice if someone could make this work in FreeBSD 4.x again,
 or, at the very least, correct the problem in FreeBSD-5.1.  
 -thanks
 -Brian
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message