From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 13 00:59:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B06116A41A for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:59:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE61443D46 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:59:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1FpxFa-000N7G-2Q; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:59:22 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20060613000605.85741.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060613000605.85741.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <14151682-BBC8-4412-B4A8-6EEFAD0C1DF6@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:59:21 -0600 To: danial_thom@yahoo.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD is #1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:59:23 -0000 On Jun 12, 2006, at 6:06 PM, Danial Thom wrote: > > > --- Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700, >> Danial Thom wrote: >>> Freebsd 4.x no doubt :) >> >> At this point FreeBSD 6.x has had way more >> intensive stress testing >> and QA by the project than 4.x did. It is >> stable. >> >> Kris >> > > I'm not saying that its not, only that I know a > lot of ISPs and more of them are running 4 than > 6. In fact I know exactly 0 running 6. So > proclaiming that Freebsd is #1 without qualifying > what version they are running doesn't really say > anything. We're small but we're running 6.0/6.1 plus a couple of Solaris 10 machines for specific purposes. Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net