From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Jan  7 02:35:04 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id CAA13044
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 02:35:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.4])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id CAA13038;
          Tue, 7 Jan 1997 02:35:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca14-58.ix.netcom.com [207.92.174.122]) by dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id CAA18227; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 02:34:23 -0800
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id CAA03389; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 02:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 02:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199701071034.CAA03389@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jmacd@CS.Berkeley.EDU
CC: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199701070939.BAA00852@paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU> (message from Josh MacDonald on Tue, 07 Jan 1997 01:39:24 -0800)
Subject: Re: upgrading texinfo
From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * After that, to pursue my original goal, bsd.port.mk needs work
 * to encourage the installation of info files correctly (using
 * install-info).

That's all nice and fine, but I still don't exactly understand what
bsd.port.mk has to do with this.  Shouldn't ports' Makefiles be
patched to use install-info?

Satoshi