From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 11 7:27: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com (mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B39737B416 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:27:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from fwd02.sul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 16kRhB-0000Lf-08; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:26:41 +0100 Received: from spirit.corecode.ath.cx (320050403952-0001@[80.128.107.3]) by fmrl02.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 16kRh5-1G0wHQC; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:26:35 +0100 Received: from elevation.zuhause.stoert.net (elevation.zuhause.stoert.net [192.168.66.46]) by spirit.corecode.ath.cx (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2BFQYs02087; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:26:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from corecode@corecode.ath.cx) Received: (from corecode@localhost) by elevation.zuhause.stoert.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2BFQYw10021; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:26:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from corecode) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:26:31 +0100 From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" To: hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org Cc: hitmaster2k@yahoo.com, rizzo@icir.org, bts@babbleon.org, kris@obsecurity.org, freebsd-user@netscum.dyndns.dk, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance of FreeBSD vs NetBSD (was: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable) Message-Id: <20020311162631.7321fc96.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20020311151031.14799.qmail@web21108.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20020311064831.A42820@iguana.icir.org> <20020311151031.14799.qmail@web21108.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.2claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--freebsd4.5) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TytkXWuxah(=.EVh" X-Sender: 320050403952-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --TytkXWuxah(=.EVh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:10:31 -0800 (PST) Hiten Pandya wrote: > --- Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > As I already asked: > > what compile time options were used in the two cases ? > > They surely can make a huge difference. > > > > cheers > > luigi > > > > Could it also be a possibility, that the NetBSD defaults differ from > the FreeBSD defaults, I think this could make some difference too. :) actually he mentioned in his post that he used the _same_ binary on fbsd and netbsd (statically linked, netbsd with fbsd emu layer) -- /"\ http://corecode.ath.cx/ \ / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \ Against HTML Mail and News --TytkXWuxah(=.EVh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE8jMypr5S+dk6z85oRAoosAJ9F4+ODcFpDdur6/7B+DoyWq9qAOgCgwyyC 9fTiD2gpoxFij/reqJOA3LQ= =4Nkx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TytkXWuxah(=.EVh-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message