From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 05:44:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4448737B401 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 05:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bluhayz.homeunix.org (ip68-106-103-50.nv.nv.cox.net [68.106.103.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA2E43FE3 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 05:44:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dero@bluhayz.homeunix.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by bluhayz.homeunix.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id h3UCjaT06061; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:45:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dero@bluhayz.homeunix.org) From: agent dero X-Authentication-Warning: bluhayz.homeunix.org: nobody set sender to dero@bluhayz.homeunix.org using -f Received: from 172.178.229.216 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dero) by bluhayz.homeunix.org with HTTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:45:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3045.172.178.229.216.1051706735.squirrel@bluhayz.homeunix.org> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:45:35 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: FBSD 5 & SMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:44:02 -0000 I was reading the FBSD 5.0 release notes, and how the new version has better support for multiple processors. I haven't been able to find any a 4.x-STABLE SMP support docs. Does this mean that 4.7, my current release, doesn't support the multiple processors well. I am rebuilding my small business' server, and trying to decide if a dual processor will be the better way to go, but not sure if the advantages are going to be huge with the. I read the previous message about WITH_THREADS as a ports option, but the ports maximizing the dual CPUs isn't my greatest, I need the kernel itself to maximize the CPUs. Is this possible under any of the stable releases, before 5.0 ?? prost, agent dero