From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Feb 26 17:45:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA18559 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 17:45:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA18512 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 17:44:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michaelh@cet.co.jp) Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.8/CET-v2.2) with SMTP id BAA01374; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 01:43:57 GMT Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 10:43:56 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock To: Nate Williams cc: Johnathan Raymond Sconiers II , Johnathan Raymond Sconiers II , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: do you support In-Reply-To: <199802261802.LAA27404@mt.sri.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 26 Feb 1998, Nate Williams wrote: > Nope, Stefan Esser wrote all of the NCR drivers, and if I may say so > myself, I've only one *ONE* problem (and it turned out to be in another > part of the system that triggered the 'error') in the 2.5 years I've > owned them, while the Adaptec people have weekly problems. The > advantage of having access to the programming documentation has been > obvious to me. Now that Adaptec owns Symbios I wonder if the document availability will change. > (This is not to say that the Adaptec stuff isn't good, but for me the > NCR has provided me *much* better bang for the buck with almost *zero* > problems.) I use both and I haven't had problems with either. If you get Adaptec, then get the 2940 series except for the AU which is a piece of crap. Regards, Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message