Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Feb 2000 14:21:26 -0800
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        John Milford <jwm@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
Cc:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Filesystem size limit?
Message-ID:  <20000215142126.B20898@orion.ac.hmc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200002151924.LAA02584@soda.csua.Berkeley.edu>; from jwm@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU on Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 11:24:30AM -0800
References:  <peter@netplex.com.au> <200002151924.LAA02584@soda.csua.Berkeley.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 11:24:30AM -0800, John Milford wrote:
> 
> 	Is there any real interest in moving beyond 1TB?  I think that
> it would incur a non-trival overhead as I believe that unsigned ints
> would not work and we would be looking at going to 64 bit values.  Or
> I guess something could be done to simulate larger sectors, but that
> is pure speculation.

There should be.  The digital library people are talking about tens of
petabytes per site and that's probably just the beginning.  I think
they ordered a petabyte scale array earlier this year.  Obviously we'd
like FreeBSD to be able to play with those. ;-)

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000215142126.B20898>