Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:57:21 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204942] lang/sbcl: Update to 1.3.1 Message-ID: <bug-204942-13-ZB74CTMgVR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-204942-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-204942-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204942 --- Comment #10 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- no, it's clear that the bootstrap versions do not have to match the upcoming target, only that they build it. Example: FreeBSD bootstrap is currently 1.1.0 and builds 1.2.9. Why would I put a lower 1.2.7 in LOCAL/marino when 1.2.9 is already there? this make no sense. Also, where does "sbcl-1.2.7-x86-64-dragonfly-binary.tar.bz2" come from? Who built it? Is it on SF? My recommendation is to keep dragonfly how it was, using the same bootstrap it already was. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204942-13-ZB74CTMgVR>