From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 20 13:20:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A4F84F2 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7614C1F27 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0KDK1vO024990 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s0KDK1HY024989; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:20:01 GMT Message-Id: <201401201320.s0KDK1HY024989@freefall.freebsd.org> To: office@FreeBSD.org From: Jan Henrik Sylvester Subject: Re: ports/185886: Fix editors/openoffice-4 port to build on FreeBSD-current post-gcc removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jan Henrik Sylvester List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:20:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/185886; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jan Henrik Sylvester To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Kabaev Cc: Subject: Re: ports/185886: Fix editors/openoffice-4 port to build on FreeBSD-current post-gcc removal Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:06:12 +0100 I have done something very similar in ports/185401 about three weeks ago. Although the port seems to be broken not only on 10 (or current), no one picked it up. Maybe anyone could use a maintainer timeout? (You are @FreeBSD, or is it only for src?) I am not sure, which of the patches is more correct: Since freetype2/ is already searched, I have removed the freetype/ as it was done in the freetype port, while you inserted freetype2/ coming from the level above.