From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 8 15:09:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8619516A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:09:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA4D43D2D for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:09:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0Trs-0007ld-LV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:09:04 +0000 Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i28N94Vi018321 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:09:04 GMT (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.12.10/8.12.6/Submit) id i28N93pQ018320 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:09:04 GMT Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:09:03 +0000 From: Jonathon McKitrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040308230903.GA18286@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1B0Trs-0007ld-LV*IwN2tXFOXqQ* Subject: pkg_add -r vs portupgrade -NP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:09:07 -0000 I've noticed that sometimes pkg_add -r finds packases while portupgrade -NP does not. Is there any good reason for this? Is portupgrade more sensitive to differences between the version of FreeBSD running and the one the packages are listed for? NOTE: Please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed. Thanks. jm -- My other computer is your windows box.