From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 22 16:40:22 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA12923
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 16:40:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA12894
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 16:40:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA22590; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 17:23:48 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199701230023.RAA22590@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Commerical applications (was: Development and validation
To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams)
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 17:23:48 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, nate@mt.sri.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com,
        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199701222341.QAA27480@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Jan 22, 97 04:41:00 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> No, he stated that having people 'vote' on what features should be in
> FreeBSD is only going to affect the core member by generating more work
> for them if the voting is more than something to make the users feel
> better about 'controlling' FreeBSD.
> 
> It has nothing to do with a 'framework' or any other social organism.

You apparently agree with Jordan.

Question: How will it generate work?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.