Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:24:40 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo <danger@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Options for redundant storage cluster? Message-ID: <9eee696238d5656dfc0e54a346aec18e@services.rulez.sk> In-Reply-To: <201002190140.o1J1eJt8013186@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201002190140.o1J1eJt8013186@mail.r-bonomi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:40:19 -0600 (CST), Robert Bonomi > For the illiterati, like myself, _what_ does "committed to head" mean? head is a synonym for -CURRENT. You can read more about this topic in our great handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html What it basically means, is that the code hit the source tree of the development branch, which allows it to be publicly available for other developers and early adopters. After the code in head is considered stable, it gets merged to the -stable branches (8.x, 7.x) and will be part of the next release which will be cut from the given branch (like 8.2 or 7.4). -- Kind regards Daniel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9eee696238d5656dfc0e54a346aec18e>