From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 15:51:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D15AD97 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:51:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA254C2 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3016B84 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:51:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2C0AD8B5E; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:51:13 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: BURN_BRIDGES in bsd.own.mk Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:51:12 +0100 Message-ID: <86zk0q1czz.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:51:15 -0000 We still have code in bsd.own.mk to support a selection of old-style NO_FOO options, protected by .if !defined(BURN_BRIDGES) (which is not in any way related to the similarly-named kernel option). There is also bsd.compat.mk, which handles the even older-style NOFOO options (by translating them to NO_FOO and emitting a warning). These chunks of code date back to 2006 and 2004, respectively. I think it's way past time we nuked them. Any objections? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no