Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:05:10 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: "Raphael H. Becker" <rabe@p-i-n.com> Subject: Re: Accessing SCSI-Devices >2TB Message-ID: <200506082105.24359.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20050608122324.C41471@p-i-n.com> References: <20050608122324.C41471@p-i-n.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart55912633.fYYoQ5YYtT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:53, Raphael H. Becker wrote: > The RAID was preconfigured with two 50% partitions which were assigned > to two LUNs. FreeBSD 5.4 was able to detect those as da1 and da2 with > full capacity. > > For particular reasons I need one filesystem. > > The support for this RAID told me just SuSE Linux and W2k3/64Bit Systems > are able to access devices >2TB (64bit LBA) therefore the larger RAIDs > are preconfigured with smaller partitions. This sentance doesn't make sense.. They ARE able to access >2Tb so the RAID is _split_.. Why would you do that? If they can access 2Tb disks then surely you'd just present it as one drive= =20 and be done with it. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart55912633.fYYoQ5YYtT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCptf85ZPcIHs/zowRAtoHAJwPO6pe4Rhrq7wctF9GowXmJy+WnQCePmFs iL3hDP2PzCTkCtOHT+tPAg0= =L2Vh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart55912633.fYYoQ5YYtT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506082105.24359.doconnor>