Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 16:40:18 -0600 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org> Cc: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>, Bill Swingle <unfurl@dub.net>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sites running FreeBSD Message-ID: <37166AD2.5143A6A2@softweyr.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990415120226.10477C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
>
> > Robert Watson wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Steve Price wrote:
> > >
> > > > Though not all commercial entities, what about the following?
> > > >
> > > > www.apache.org
> > > > www.daemonnews.org
> > > > www.dignus.com
> > > > www.freebsdrocks.com
> > > > www.geek-girl.com
> > > > www.hungry.com
> > > > www.openldap.org
> > > > www.unix-vs-nt.org
> > > > www.watson.com
> > >
> > > Utterly irrelevant from an advocacy point of view
> >
> > No, I'd say several of these might be relevant from an advocacy point
> > of view.
>
> I think I either mistyped or you misinterpretted: I was not referring to
> his list, but my unrelated comment on the list. :) I have watson.org,
> they have watson.com. Both run FreeBSD, and people probably have heard of
> watson.com although not watson.org.
Oh. I see we're in violent agreement then. ;^)
> I agree entirely that prominent
> domain names running FreeBSD is an excellent advocacy point; it's even
> better when they slap a "FreeBSD" stamp on their front page, of course.
Yes, we're in complete agreement. I guess we'd better start a major
flamefest about who is more right, or who was right first. ;^)
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37166AD2.5143A6A2>