From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 21:37:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8817106564A; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6270B8FC0C; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj8 with SMTP id 8so2990374pwj.13 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:37:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ga/iZYvI2bkJL8hcDc2NMKVA4JJpDf2S8jZNO/0qmQw=; b=oZ/SkjLel2iruleHaiaXkRPPA7d2dez2Q/SmV82Vmudae5rUabBb6PKGiHxSosqkYX lXnfTxaLuKWw/IePY+P3ovFG3zetDO2qa7Sp2+SSgGk6b+xyvaxQ/L12p+TJhQIlojwI ogQHwjVFnuTxtl/ZDgZMEBImnGRW6A5j/nmvc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mdrtjgRiNnkZN/ZdtoxfvOmroNTFYQae0WyBCs8aNNS6oc+A6MxitFAmI6OkOu+xy0 BpdxVc/df6EQtKmngSONL75jvXj1yAPLwmBrcaYZMICCP+zil4t6BMkWozACKfsVIf/4 stIX6nir0mkWCHHBPjP0SH2hMXC9o89TB40FE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.69.39 with SMTP id b7mr2256885pbu.403.1307396265794; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.52.164 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:37:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4D934AF4.9080503@FreeBSD.org> <742085CD-7F6F-4879-9FFD-517EC3203D52@bsdimp.com> <5AF348C8-6AB6-490D-A12E-89A51528F58F@bsdimp.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:37:44 -0400 Message-ID: From: Arnaud Lacombe To: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: mdf@freebsd.org, "Robert N. M. Watson" , Dimitry Andric , freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: Include file search path X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:37:46 -0000 Hi, On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > > On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > >> Hi Warner, >> >> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh wrote: >>> >>> On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: >>> >>>> On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote: >>>> >>>>>> (2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD. =A0This seems like = a basic >>>>>> =A0requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's n= ot yet a >>>>>> =A0resolved issue? >>>>> >>>>> 0 work has been done here to my knowledge. =A0The world view for clan= g and our in-tree gcc differ which makes it a challenge. >>>> >>>> That's disappointing. I seem to recall it's more an issue of our build= integration with clang/LLVM than an underlying issue in clang/LLVM? >>> >>> Yes. =A0The problem isn't hard, the cross compile paradigm is just a li= ttle different. >>> >>>>>> We (Cambridge) are currently bringing up FreeBSD on a new soft-core = 64-bit MIPS platform. =A0We're already using a non-base gcc for our boot lo= ader work, and plan to move to using clang/LLVM later in the year. =A0The b= ase system seems a bit short on detail when it comes to the above, currentl= y. >>>>> >>>>> Yes. =A0I've had to add about a dozen changes so far to get close to = building with xdev compilers. =A0A similar number are needed to make it eas= y to configure and add systree support, I think. >>>> >>>> Sounds like great progress -- do you think we'll ship 9.0 in a "just w= orks" state with regard to this? >>> >>> I sure hope so. =A0I'd like to have demoable stuff by BSDcan. >>> >> BSDCan has passed, has there been any advance made since that discussion= ? > > It is "demonstrable" but not ready to commit to the tree. =A0Needs about = 4 hours of work that I've had trouble scheduling on it due to work getting = busier than I expected. > any chances to have a look at the patch or should I wait for the final comm= it ? Thanks, - Arnaud