From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jul 7 9:28: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from tasam.com (tasam.com [206.161.83.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0BF15286 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 09:28:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from korvus@tasam.com) Received: from localhost (korvus@localhost) by tasam.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA28506; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 12:27:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 12:27:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Korvus [PINE]" To: Andrew Fremantle Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Networking In-Reply-To: <19990707160202.3037.rocketmail@web220.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > 1) I have accumulated a large amount of experience with the Linux > implementation of NAT, a kernel-land trick they call "IP Masquerade". > I am aware that FreeBSD, and presumably the other BSDs offer similar > functionality in the form of a user-land "NATd". I need to know if it > is as functional as the Linux implmentation? The Linux implementation > has "helper" modules for troublesome protocols such as ftp, irc, icq, > even Quake (I do HalfLife though :). Will these work across a BSD box > doing NAT? I believe so, though I am not familliar with the Linux implementations and I just started using NATd today (though I have been told that it works flawlessly with a number of protocals). > 2) This one is a bit lengthy, involves ASCII artwork, and is > network-general, though I hope it will apply to FreeBSD or any free > 'nix. > > 10BaseT Ethernet > > A (WinNT) > | > ADSL --- HUB --- B (Win95) > | > C (whatever) > > All the machines in this scenario pull IP off a DHCP server over the > ADSL. > > Transfers from any local machines, such as A sending a file to B > cause the ADSL modem to go nutzo. The transfer is also very slow (by > ethernet standards). Just pull the ethernet wire from the ADSL modem > and it speeds up DRAMATICALLY. I am looking at putting a 'nix box on > this network, and if I can make it act as a switch* between the ADSL > modem and the rest of the network, than so much the better. The only > "switch" I have seen or have experience with is a 3Com SuperStack ][ > (I think), which is more than a little bit out of my budget. Can > anyone suggest a cheap piece of network hardware or a 'nix OS that > can do this? > > * I understand a "switch" to be a device that examines the MAC > address of machines on the network, and only passes packets on to > another interface if such is necessary. This would mean packets from > A to B don't need to go over the modem, and would not. > With a FreeBSD (or any unix) system, you can configure it as a router if you put 2 NICs in it, which will provide the functionality you require. Once again, I am only vaguely familliar with the concept so you should check www.freebsd.org for info. Here's a start: http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ161.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message