From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jan 23 14:26:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA23548 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 14:26:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA23543 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 14:26:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA20561; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 14:26:11 -0800 To: Marc van Kempen cc: Paul Traina , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WARNING: proposed change to samba port In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 23 Jan 1996 10:56:50 +0100." <199601230956.KAA08133@nietzsche.bowtie.nl> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 14:26:11 -0800 Message-ID: <20552.822435971@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk That's actually kind of a bogus argument. By those rights, we've have everything from /usr/local/bash to /usr/local/emacs! Where does one draw the line? By size? I don't think so since that would only lead to a hodge-podge of ports with everyone's differing opinions of which ones were "big enough to get their own hierarchy" I think that /usr/local/samba should die. It's the odd-man out here. I agree with Paul. Jordan