From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Aug 29 12:39:15 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801D91088D71 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:39:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D458B49E for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:39:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CB0E41088D6F; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B141088D6E for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 359068B49D for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from Debian-exim by mx.nsu.ru with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1fuzkd-0001uH-DR for x11@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 19:39:11 +0700 Received: from [84.237.50.47] (helo=regency.nsu.ru) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1fuzkd-0001u1-BL; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 19:39:11 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id w7TD37D7089920; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 19:03:07 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id w7TD32Wj089864; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:03:02 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:03:02 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Niclas Zeising Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: drm2 deprecation in base: problems with gpu-firmware-kmod port Message-ID: <20180829130302.GA88024@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20180829120935.GA79911@regency.nsu.ru> <20180829122523.GA82936@regency.nsu.ru> <20180829124049.GA84960@regency.nsu.ru> <317f97a7-9cae-0932-b40d-2e8487bce93b@daemonic.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <317f97a7-9cae-0932-b40d-2e8487bce93b@daemonic.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 3 X-KLMS-Message-Action: skipped X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, whitelist X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: not scanned, whitelist X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.1.705, not scanned, whitelist X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:39:15 -0000 On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 02:32:01PM +0200, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 08/29/18 14:40, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 02:06:34PM +0200, Niclas Zeising wrote: > >>On 08/29/18 14:25, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >>> -radeonkmsfw_RV710_pfp: could not load firmware image, error 2 > >>> +radeonkmsfw_RV710_pfp: firmware image loaded, but did not register > >> > >>Just for clarification, is that a change in the message (with the + and > >>- as in diff) or the entire message? > > > >It's a diff :) sorry for not mentioning; I've omitted some other nearby > >changes which are due to [drm:pid????] being different. > > > >>I have to look into this a bit more. > > This is quite strange. Did you install the firmware port from ports, or > did you build it yourself? >From the ports of course, via good old "svn up && make install". > Looking at the actual firmware files (the uuencoded binary blobs) they > are the same (same sha256 sum) in both the source for the > gpu-firmware-kmod package and from what's in [-CURRENT]. I can't update to the tip of the HEAD due to my world being June 9ish and I'd rather not rebuild everything right now, but I'd assume that firmware for old RV710 did not change and should be the same between kernels from June 9 vs. when it was recently reverted. > It might be that they are built slightly differnt though, I guess. I'll have a closer look myself as well once I have some spare time cycles; things are a bit hectic here at $work ATM. ./danfe