From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 15 16:53:37 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA24012 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 15 Dec 1996 16:53:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from zen.nash.org (nash.pr.mcs.net [204.95.47.72]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA24007 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 1996 16:53:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from zen.nash.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.nash.org (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA00386; Sun, 15 Dec 1996 18:51:04 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <32B49CF8.41C67EA6@mcs.com> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 18:51:04 -0600 From: Alex Nash X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.1.6.1-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Terry Lambert CC: Peter Wemm , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: poll(2) References: <199612152053.NAA23897@phaeton.artisoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Terry Lambert wrote: > This would be the modification of the remaining time for a non-null, > non-zero timeval struct? > > You should note that this will not work for much of the software in the > known universe... I think even Linux backed this one out after it caused > problems with ...oh... Netscape. Unless this has changed very recently, I don't think this is true. I just looked at Linux 2.1.5 and it still seems to return time remaining. Peter, if you do change the semantics of select(), you might also want to yank out the extra code in the Linux emulator's select(). Alex