Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:04:00 +0900 From: Hidetoshi Shimokawa <simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: Barry Bouwsma <freebsd-misuser@remove-NOSPAM-to-reply.NOSPAM.dyndns.dk> Cc: FreeBSD Firewire Developers <firewire@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: (none) Message-ID: <ybsk77qorbj.wl@ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <200309300307.h8U37PW12960@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> References: <200309152131.h8FLV2271240@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> <ybsu17ceorb.wl@ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <200309180452.h8I4qxS58023@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> <200309201256.h8KCusu53498@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> <ybsn0cxpnjx.wl@ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <200309300307.h8U37PW12960@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 30 Sep 2003 05:07:25 +0200 (CEST), Barry Bouwsma wrote: > What I am looking for, is that the firewire drive is made available > as da0 at boot, ideally with support in kernel modules instead of the > kernel proper, for unattended operation where a crash/reboot or power > failure is possible and I have no chance to correct things by hand. > This means, no unplug/re-plug, and no `fwcontrol' ... > > Now that I see that the recent 4.9-PRERELEASE codes support the drive > with no need for my hacks, apart from the observation that the drive > does not seem to be CAM-scanned at boot -- at least as a kernel module > with 4.5-era tools -- I'll see how things work with a kernel built > including firewire/sbp support, rather than modules. Did you chage SCSI_DELAY from the default 15sec? /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa \/ simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp PGP public key: http://www.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~simokawa/pgp.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ybsk77qorbj.wl>