From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 15 22:23:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E451065701 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:23:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1142C8FC17 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so10603484obb.13 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 15:23:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=UwzXeG9TdAOJZ+hTSPRn7v3DhNgOTvkGvxexOSV70c0=; b=VCeAo5RWe0GQ78cYeNStXungNWhdgIbl4qwmCkpfOEmBFSozps0SskZmP3NvYDyRiw Gys8PLChafl20KDvLYor4aoHs1jGV9jkEH/Sn5aSwLZwldzBG05kSo2jjmv0omJpvxmn rf4DWs5XrcFVZ3WeYH9X4MpzY2mz+0/M5wOl8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=UwzXeG9TdAOJZ+hTSPRn7v3DhNgOTvkGvxexOSV70c0=; b=BIHr0PbWwrDP0hU2dmhCglPq5XFgW7J823LspcsMUP8vSXB6hSvNbuEp77pO1XLr+2 KsQqT2sUvegB3cNrV+GL4bmKulglOlXTrlhXlTITjb1YMcloCCX3o74S389ycBRPZIBj Auin+ToxEgzCPUUpUvoYto7z7mXR6V6H7qHihZ2HFYIdDjuCE9XQqy2oGrGcw4Ang4P6 EWeccUIBo/l1XyjrCvVoSl7PhojZoDnwALoa0HxSCpVSDYCAUxUxsevDvnhKYOSqUYcM hGNG9k0M/5nCWyJ7cuEuHP/oAxQ8PHt7akCOsUkGjp8WkfecewVtLUnc2fNfOLKiX1cZ 9eSw== Received: by 10.182.88.9 with SMTP id bc9mr12548146obb.4.1342390980621; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 15:23:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.125.70 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 15:22:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120715221743.GA26377@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20120715214758.GA26300@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120715221743.GA26377@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 15:22:29 -0700 Message-ID: To: Eitan Adler , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzqB8wuFDFuOPPnxpuJ6bEJszDBBbLyiM+JjI1cEX0Ul6S2OQuVFWwig+n+sXCuZTgXMlM Cc: Subject: Re: where is LOCALBASE actually defined? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:23:01 -0000 On 15 July 2012 15:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I though LOCALBASE has meaning outside > of the ports system too. Clearly I was wrong. > > So, if I happen not to have the ports tree, > I cannot use LOCALBASE in my makefiles, right? correct. LOCALBASE is a ports tree specific thing. you could define it yourself as follows: LOCALBASE?=/usr/local -- Eitan Adler