Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 17:19:23 -0400 From: Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> To: Nathaniel W Filardo <nwf@cs.jhu.edu> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10-STABLE/sparc64 panic Message-ID: <CA75738D-066D-4EDC-9018-89936EE861C6@distal.com> In-Reply-To: <20140519205047.GP24043@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> References: <20140518083413.GK24043@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> <751F7778-95CE-40FC-857F-222FB37737C0@distal.com> <20140518235853.GM24043@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> <20140519145222.GN24043@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> <A092DFEB-D5CF-473E-88BD-81B005C26C57@distal.com> <20140519193529.GO24043@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> <20140519205047.GP24043@gradx.cs.jhu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 19, 2014, at 16:50, Nathaniel W Filardo <nwf@cs.jhu.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:35:29PM -0400, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote:
>> I'm currently going way back to 44aad33d (r261716) and will see what
>> happens.
>=20
> First boot went fine, second boot failed in the same way. Blech.
I fear we may be tracking two issues, or otherwise have a problem
in our communications or processes.
I built and installed r262783, and have booted it three times to
multi-user on the first try. The same was true with two boots of
r262743 earlier.
You said at some point that the traceback changed. Depending
on specifics of our hardwares, there may be two problems on yours
an only one on mine. I=92m grasping, here, but. You=92re using a v240,
correct? Mine has two 1.5 Ghz Ultra-Sparc-IIIi=92s in it, and 8 GB of
memory. And just the on-board hardware otherwise, two disk drives.
I suppose I can keep moving forward, but I=92m dismayed that we=92re
getting such different results on what we thought was the same test.
- Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA75738D-066D-4EDC-9018-89936EE861C6>